🔗 Share this article Iran States It May Rejoin American Nuclear Discussions provided that Approached with 'Respect' and 'Honor' Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared. The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns. Walking a Difficult Path The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June. He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks. Prior Discussions Suddenly Concluded The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader claiming the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact. Magic Solution Proposed Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military. It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America". Existing Situation Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks resume. The US president recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a show. Political Position In his speech to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a truce. Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to restore. Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always sought to impose their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and continues the final answer to address disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be respected." "If they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach." Repair and Recovery In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary." He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to break. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this assault."