🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.